Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 663

R. v. Ranu

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed a criminal appeal from convictions for sexual assault and assault, upholding a trial judge’s refusal to hear a mid-trial disclosure application.

  • Sexual assault
  • Assault
  • Third-party disclosure
  • S.278.1 criminal code
  • Mid-trial applications
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Corporate law 2025 BCSC 1777

Yen v. Ghahramani

The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed an application to re-open a 44-day trial based on post-trial disclosure of Lee Documents, finding no miscarriage of justice or likely change in result.

  • Re‑opening trial
  • Document disclosure
  • Discovery obligations
  • Credibility assessment
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Rule 7‑5 pre‑trial examination
Read case analysis
Contract law 2025 BCCA 68

1104318 B.C. Ltd. v. Dr. Paul Wittenberg, Inc.

Appeal dismissed from a trial judgment in a dental-practice sale dispute. The Court upheld the refusal to reopen the case for new witness evidence and an adverse inference over missing records.

  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Breach of contract
  • Re-opening trial to admit fresh evidence
  • Adverse inference for non-production of documents
  • Expert witness admissibility
  • Document production
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 2642

Parolin v. Cressey Construction Corporation

The Supreme Court of British Columbia refused to adjourn the trial, finding the issues were sufficiently identified, the request was late, and delay would prejudice the plaintiff.

  • Adjournment principles
  • Judicial discretion
  • Fair trial
  • Prejudice
  • Adjournment
  • Trial-management
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 2090

Derencinovic v. 7 West Homes Ltd.

The court held the adverse party witness rule allows cross-examination generally on pleaded issues and refused to limit it to what was strictly necessary to prove the plaintiff’s case.

  • Adverse party witness rule
  • Cross-examination scope
  • Procedural fairness
  • Inherent jurisdiction
  • Trial management powers
  • Adverse-party-witness-rule
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 2014

The Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique v. British Columbia

The court refused to require Karine Boily to testify by affidavit, holding the application was premature and would unduly restrict the Conseil’s presentation of its case.

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Affidavit versus oral testimony
  • Trial management power
  • Substantive equivalence
  • Proportionality
  • Trial-management
Read case analysis
Evidence 2024 BCSC 1701

Mand v. Cheema

The court dismissed a trial application to admit a late expert medical report about a witness’s cognition and refused to abridge service time.

  • Expert admissibility
  • Abridgment of expert report service time
  • Witness credibility and reliability
  • Capacity to testify
  • Trial management and scheduling
  • Expert-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 2560

R. v. Ali

The court dismissed an accused’s request to revisit an order refusing mid-testimony cross-examination of a Crown DNA witness after a longer-than-expected gap between testimony parts.

  • Cross-examination
  • Splitting witness testimony
  • Revisit prior ruling
  • Admissibility of business records
  • Publication restrictions
  • Witness-testimony
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2022 BCCA 329

Niloufari v. Sheena

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr. Niloufari’s application for leave to appeal after the trial judge refused a further adjournment and the action was dismissed for abandonment.

  • Adjournment
  • Trial scheduling
  • Dismissal for abandonment
  • Leave to appeal
  • Severance of liability and quantum
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 BCSC 974

R. v. Alkahlil

The court refused to let defence counsel ask witnesses to power up seized BlackBerrys in open court, citing risks of data alteration and an ongoing investigation.

  • Electronic evidence
  • Powering up seized devices
  • Chain of custody
  • Section 605 criminal code procedure
  • Publication ban s.648(1)
  • Electronic-evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.