Beckman v. Vinci
Plaintiff failed to prove contractual loans; defendants failed to rebut presumption of resulting trust so transfers are held on resulting trust for plaintiff; alternatively transfers were procured by presumed undue influence because plaintiff was vulnerable from Huntington's disease and defendant had opportunity to dominate his will; credit card charges were authorized and conversion not proven; employer had just cause to terminate Karen for serious breaches of fiduciary duty; plaintiff liable in tort for a single sexual assault incident and awarded $15,000 general damages.
Source excerpt
- Resulting trust
- Undue influence
- Conversion
- Wrongful dismissal
- Sexual assault and battery
- Capacity and vulnerability