Yin v. Zhang Estate
Extension of time was granted because appellants demonstrated a continued bona fide intention to appeal, respondents would not be unduly prejudiced by the delay, and it was in the interests of justice to decide the appeal on its merits; security for costs was ordered because appellants are in precarious financial circumstances, there is a real risk of non-recovery, the appeal's merits are weak, and the balance of prejudice favours requiring security for both the appeal and the Supreme Court proceedings.
Source excerpt
- Extension of time to file appeal record and factum
- Security for costs of appeal and trial
- Substitutional service and adding non-parties
- Stay of enforcement
- Remedial constructive trust
- Punitive damages