Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 733

R. v. Coghill

Sentencing reasons for a violent, planned home invasion led to 11-year and 12-year global sentences, with credit for custody and strict bail conditions.

  • Home invasion
  • Robbery
  • Aggravated assault
  • Unlawful confinement
  • Discharge of firearm
  • Firearm prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 372

R. v. Correia

The court accepted the joint submission of 14 years parole ineligibility because the proposed term falls within the established 12–15 year range for comparable cases, the case does not exhibit the exceptional moral culpability required for a >15 year bar under Cerra, and Anthony‑Cook requires deference to a joint submission that does not bring the administration of justice into disrepute; the offender's rehabilitation, remorse and timing further supported the sentence.

  • Second degree murder
  • Parole ineligibility period under s.745(c)
  • Joint submission
  • Rehabilitation
  • Dna order
  • Firearms prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 1514

R. v. Basran

Sentencing reasons for a guilty plea to obstructing justice. The court imposed an 18-month conditional sentence with curfew, reporting, and no-contact conditions.

  • Obstruction of justice
  • Conditional sentence order
  • Guilty plea
  • Agreed statement of facts
  • Mitigation and aggravation
  • Victim impact statements
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 BCSC 2364

R. v. Holt

Sentencing for second degree murder. The court accepted a joint submission and imposed life imprisonment with parole ineligibility for 10 years, plus ancillary orders.

  • Second degree murder
  • Parole ineligibility period under s.745.4
  • Joint submission on sentence
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Ancillary orders (dna, firearms prohibition, no communication)
  • Second-degree-murder
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 1004

R. v. McLeod

On a guilty plea for assault with a weapon, the court sentenced Mr. McLeod to 2 years and 3 months in custody, followed by 18 months of probation.

  • Assault with a weapon
  • Gladue report and principles
  • Pre-sentence custody credit
  • Probation conditions
  • Ancillary orders (firearms prohibition, dna)
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 1693

R. v. Fabas

Sentencing reasons for Daniel Joseph Fabas, who pleaded guilty to manslaughter with a firearm and possessing a firearm while prohibited. He received a seven-year effective sentence.

  • Manslaughter
  • Use of firearm
  • Possession while prohibited
  • Consecutive sentencing
  • Mitigation and aggravation
  • Manslaughter-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 NSPC 53

R, v. Walsh

Balancing aggravating factors (possession of a knife, victim impact, need for general deterrence) against mitigating factors (attempt only, no display or use of weapon, immediate cooperation, evidence of rehabilitation), the court found moral culpability at the lower end of the moderate range, imposed a three-year custodial sentence, and applied Carvery remand credit of 1.5 days per day (123 days). The court also imposed ancillary orders including DNA collection, no-contact endorsement, fines/surcharge and a mandatory firearm prohibition.

  • Attempted robbery
  • Sentencing principles
  • General deterrence
  • Dna collection order
  • Firearm prohibition
  • Sentencing parity
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2009 NSPC 46

R. v. Stevens

A conditional discharge with 18 months probation was appropriate because the offender had no prior record, the actual physical harm was limited, the public interest in preserving an Indigenous educator and rehabilitating her outweighed the need for incarceration, and Gladue principles support choosing restorative non‑custodial sanctions where they better serve public and community interests; tailored probation and a significant driving restriction provide accountability and denunciation without custody.

  • Assault with a weapon
  • Use of vehicle as a weapon
  • Conditional discharge
  • Gladue factors
  • Probation
  • Driving restriction as sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2008 NSSC 380

R. v. Doyle

Because the jury found the accused an active participant who aided and abetted a premeditated, violent home invasion of a vulnerable elderly victim, the aggravating factors (premeditation, victim vulnerability, violence, community impact) outweighed mitigation (age, remorse, addiction, treatment efforts), warranting a six-year federal custodial sentence for break and entry, concurrent four months plus one day for theft, four months credit for time served, and imposition of DNA and weapons prohibition orders.

  • Break and enter
  • Theft
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Sentencing principles
  • Deterrence
  • Rehabilitation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2007 BCCA 598

R. v. Randhawa

The British Columbia Court of Appeal reduced Amandeep Singh Randhawa’s kidnapping sentence from 13 to 11 years, giving more weight to his timely guilty plea.

  • Sentence reduction
  • Guilty plea mitigation
  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Concurrent sentencing
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.