Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 1414

R. v. Dick

On sentencing for sexual assault, the court imposed 42 months' imprisonment, limited pretrial credit, granted a narrow firearms exemption for hunting, and adjourned SOIRA.

  • Sexual assault
  • Sentencing principles
  • Gladue factors
  • Firearms prohibition exemption (s.113)
  • Soira registration
  • Pretrial custody credit
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 NSSC 67

R v. Chambers

The court imposed a 16‑month conditional discharge with specific behavioural and treatment conditions, restitution of $3,500 and a $600 victim surcharge because the offences, while serious and requiring denunciation, were committed by a first‑time offender with significant mitigating factors (guilty plea, military service, pro‑social history, remorse and risk of disproportionate collateral immigration/employment consequences); partial admission and redaction of victim impact material was required with caution against last‑minute filings.

  • Forcible entry
  • Mischief under $5000
  • Uttering threats
  • Conditional discharge
  • Victim impact statements admissibility
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 840

R. v. Alkhalil

The court admitted an edited victim impact statement in a sentencing for conspiracy to commit murder, holding that any nexus issue went to weight, not admissibility.

  • Victim impact statements
  • Admissibility
  • Conspiracy to commit murder
  • Nexus between offence and harm
  • Publication ban
  • Victim-impact-statements
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2023 FCA 32

Kurgan v. Canada (Attorney General)

The appeal is dismissed because the Federal Court correctly found the appellant lacked standing to seek judicial review of the amended Parole Board decisions, and the CVBR-based victim argument could not be raised for the first time on appeal.

  • Standing
  • Judicial review
  • Parole conditions
  • Victims bill of rights
  • Corrections and conditional release
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 NSPC 22

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Canada Border Services Agency

The court established a bespoke procedural regime: victims may convey their views by filing a signed "Statement of Victim Views" (SVV) that is dated and describes identity/privacy impacts; SVVs need not be sworn or subject to cross-examination and do not confer party or intervener status; s.722 of the Criminal Code applies mutatis mutandis; filing of SVVs will be subject to a publication ban protecting victims' names and identifying information; the Crown bears the burden to justify continued redaction on a balance of probabilities, and the court may rely on statutory frameworks and counsel s…

  • Sealing orders
  • Open court principle
  • Victim impact statements
  • Publication bans and identity protection
  • Procedural mechanisms for non-trial proceedings
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 NSSC 334

R. v. NK

The court declined to order State-funded counsel for the complainant because (1) the Province's SOLR policy legitimately limits funding to medical/counselling/therapeutic records and unrelated sexual activity and the court will not override that policy absent clear constitutional/statutory authority or compelling circumstances; (2) Crown counsel could and would, in a restrained manner, raise and protect the complainant's privacy interests at the s.278.3 process; and (3) on the facts and submissions before the court the complainant did not demonstrate a necessity for appointed State-funded cou…

  • S.278 records production
  • Publication restriction orders (ss.486.4,486.5,278.9 cc)
  • State-funded counsel / solr policy
  • Subpoena duces tecum
  • Right to full answer and defence vs complainant privacy
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 NSPC 48

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Canada (Border Services Agency)

The Court held that the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights applies to the unsealing application under s.487.3; the CVBR grants procedural and substantive rights to victims from the investigation stage (ss.12,14,18), and s.19(1) directs that those rights be exercised through mechanisms provided by law, creating a positive duty on the court to notify ascertainable victims and permit them to make submissions in unsealing proceedings; this interpretation is supported by the Act's text, preamble, legislative history (Hansard) and international instruments and harmonizes with Criminal Code protections.

  • Sealing orders and unsealing applications
  • Interpretation and application of the canadian victims bill of rights
  • Publication bans vs unsealing
  • Notice and standing of victims/third parties
  • Section 487.3 criminal code
  • Section 486.4/486.5 criminal code
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 2717

R. v. Erickson

The British Columbia Supreme Court vacated a s. 486.4 publication ban at the complainant's request, allowing Kelly Favro to identify herself publicly.

  • Section 486.4 criminal code
  • Publication ban lift
  • Victim self-identification
  • Privacy vs. free expression
  • Publication-ban
  • Victims-rights
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 NSSC 384

R. v. Goodman

The court held the Crown's conditional provision of disclosure (requiring defence counsel to sign an express undertaking before receiving specified audiotapes, SANE photos, the complainant's videotaped statement and an electronic copy of the General Occurrence Report, while providing transcripts and in-counsel access to the accused) was reasonable, did not materially infringe the accused's right to make full answer and defence, and therefore the accused's application for unconditional personal possession of all disclosure was dismissed.

  • Crown disclosure (stinchcombe)
  • S.278.1 records/mills regime
  • Publication ban
  • Right to full answer and defence
  • Use of undertakings and protective conditions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2019 BCCA 330

R. v. Tallio

The court granted further DNA testing, allowed exhibits to remain at the Netherlands Forensic Institute to avoid damage, and adjourned the intervenor's return application.

  • Dna testing
  • Evidence preservation
  • Exhibit custody and transfer
  • Publication/sealing orders
  • Dna-testing
  • Evidence-preservation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.