Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court dismissed a challenge to wiretap authorization P66/2007, holding the affidavit did not omit material facts and investigative necessity was shown for the named offences.
The court held that William Mastop was a known person for Part VI purposes and that s. 186(2) did not displace the Chesson test for a practicing solicitor.
Oral ruling on whether the Crown could tender a broad book of police files on voir dire. The court allowed only limited rebuttal materials and rejected wholesale amplification.
The court excluded disputed wiretap excerpts from a murder trial after finding their prejudicial effect outweighed their probative value and could not be cured by instruction.
The court granted leave to cross-examine selected affiants on investigative necessity for a wiretap authorization, but denied broader cross-examination requests.
The court upheld Authorization P37/2000, finding the affidavit and intercepted communications supported a credibly based probability of drug-offence evidence against Ho, and Lee was properly named as a secondary target.
The court granted leave in part to cross-examine the affiant on an interception authorization, but refused inquiries into alleged boilerplate drafting.
The court upheld wiretap authorization P45/99 against Lee and Ho, finding the informant, surveillance, and intercepted-call evidence sufficient on review.
The court held that an edited affidavit paragraph did not undermine the validity of interception authorization P54/98, and the earlier ruling upholding it remained in force.
The court upheld wiretap authorization P54/98 for Lee and Ho, holding that the amplified record showed credibly based grounds and admitted the interceptions.
Explore more
