Uni-Tech Windows Mfrs Inc. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Employer failed to meet the burden of proof that the employee's actions constituted misconduct within the meaning of section 30 because evidence was inconsistent and unreliable, there was no proof of prior warnings or a pattern of harassment, no clear evidence the employee threatened the coworker or that he knew his actions would lead to dismissal; therefore no disqualification under the Act.
Source excerpt
- Misconduct disqualification
- Loss of employment
- Evidence and credibility
- Posting and notice of policy