Robinson v. Robinson
The proposed counterclaims (other than the single allegation that Mr. Robinson failed to cooperate with the insurance claim) are not sufficiently connected to the discrete accounting claim for the Fire Insurance Proceeds and therefore do not satisfy the first stage of the two-part test; alternatively, even if connection existed, Ms. Robinson failed to justify the long delays, most claims appear time-barred or beyond the ultimate limitation period, the claims largely duplicate matters resolved or addressed in the Bevilacqua proceedings and registrar's certificate, and allowing the late counter…
Source excerpt
- Counterclaim
- Extension of time
- Limitation act s.22
- Equitable charge
- Constructive trust
- Accounting