Integrum Painting v. BANC Investments Limited
The March 5, 2025 correspondence did not, on its proper objective construction and having regard to surrounding communications and conduct, amount to a contractual "finding" that would trigger GC 8.2.2; alternatively, the Respondent is estopped from asserting the March 5 letter was a finding because its words and conduct reasonably induced the Applicant to treat the communications as settlement negotiations; accordingly the Applicant's delay claim remains extant and the parties are entitled to pursue the contractually prescribed ADR or court processes under GC 8.2.7 and GC 8.3.1.
Source excerpt
- Delay claim
- Notice requirements
- Construction manager finding
- Waiver
- Mediation
- Holdback