Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Property law 2011 BCSC 941

Vesuna v. British Columbia (Transportation)

The court dismissed a land access claim, finding the disputed road remained private and that the Crown was not negligent in approving the 1960 subdivision.

  • Public highway designation
  • Common law dedication
  • Expenditure of public monies
  • Negligent subdivision approval
  • Easement
  • Right of way
Read case analysis
Statutory interpretation 2008 ONCA 561

Blue Star Trailer Rentals Inc. v. 407 ETR Concession Company Limited

The court held that the term 'vehicle' in s.13(1) of the Highway 407 Act includes a trailer and that 'operation' encompasses towing such that 407 ETR is statutorily entitled to charge tolls to trailer owners; the accounting ordered by the application judge was set aside on equitable grounds (delay and availability of statutory dispute procedures); appeal allowed and costs awarded to 407 ETR.

  • Interpretation of 'vehicle' under highway 407 act
  • Liability for tolls for trailers
  • Equitable accounting remedy
  • Harmonization of related statutes
Read case analysis
Property law 2002 BCCA 669

Kirkpatrick v. British Columbia (Registrar of Land Titles)

The Court of Appeal held that the disputed L-shaped land was conveyed under the Crown grant, subject to a road allowance reserved to the Crown, and dismissed the appeal.

  • Crown grant construction
  • Road allowance/reservation
  • Common-law dedication
  • Highway act s.4(1) - travelled road
  • Land title act s.298 - assurance fund
  • Land survey act - effect of field notes
Read case analysis
Torts 2002 SCC 33

Housen v. Nikolaisen

The Supreme Court of Canada set out the standards of appellate review, holding that factual findings and negligence findings are reviewed for palpable and overriding error.

  • Standard of appellate review
  • Duty of care of municipalities
  • Statutory duty under rural municipality act s.192
  • Knowledge/imputed knowledge of municipality
  • Causation and warning signs
  • Apportionment of liability
Read case analysis
Property 2001 BCSC 902

Parkinson (Trustee of)

The court held Parcel A was not excluded from the Crown grant, was not dedicated as a road, and did not become a public highway under the Highway Act.

  • Crown grant interpretation
  • Dedication
  • Public highway
  • Highway act s.4(1)
  • Land act s.13 and s.57
  • Registrar registration duties
Read case analysis
Property law 2000 BCSC 383

Dunromin v. Spallumcheen

The court held that Larkin Cross Road was a public highway and granted the Township’s declarations, dismissing Dunromin’s claim.

  • Public highway
  • Dedication
  • Land title act s.107
  • Highway act s.4
  • Common law dedication
  • Deposit of subdivision plan
Read case analysis
Torts [1997] 3 SCR 1145

Lewis (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia

The Supreme Court of Canada held that British Columbia could be liable for an independent contractor’s negligent highway maintenance because the duty was non-delegable.

  • Non-delegable duty
  • Duty of care
  • Independent contractor liability
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Anns test
  • Non-delegable-duty
Read case analysis
Torts [1980] 2 SCR 418

Barratt v. Corporation of North Vancouver

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed a negligence claim arising from a bicycle accident caused by a pothole, holding the municipality’s inspection policy was a discretionary planning matter.

  • Municipal liability
  • Duty of care
  • Inspection frequency
  • Policy vs operational negligence
  • Statutory powers versus statutory duties
  • Road maintenance and potholes
Read case analysis
Municipal law [1953] 1 SCR 459

Grandel v. Mason

The Supreme Court of Canada held that highway workers could be liable for negligence after operating machinery within a protected gap near a mink farm, causing loss of mink.

  • Statutory authority
  • Duty of care
  • Sensitive use of property
  • Public works liability
  • Servants of the crown liability
  • Pleading issues (nuisance vs negligence)
Read case analysis
Motor vehicles [1935] SCR 628

Swartz Bros. Ltd. v. Wills

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the respondent failed to yield the right of way under The Highway Act and dismissed his collision claim.

  • Right of way
  • Negligence
  • Duty of care
  • Intersection collisions
  • Damages
  • Right-of-way
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.