Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Corporate law 2019 BCSC 72

Nieuwesteeg v. Ehman

The court upheld a unanimous shareholders’ agreement requiring unanimous board consent and dismissed the petition to invalidate it.

  • Unanimous shareholders' agreement
  • Unanimous consent resolution
  • Fettering of directors' discretion
  • Conflict with articles of incorporation
  • Declaratory relief
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Contract law 2017 ONCA 431

McGinn v. Evanshen

Where a shareholders' agreement expressly treats jointly-held shares as owned by one party for all purposes and contains an option on death, a sole surviving shareholder may exercise the option to purchase the deceased's shares; the motion judge's interpretation applying the factual matrix was reasonable and entitled to deference, so no extricable error of law or palpable and overriding error was shown.

  • Shareholders' agreement interpretation
  • Buy-sell provisions on death
  • Right of survivorship
  • Option to purchase on death
  • Appellate review standard (sattva)
Read case analysis
Employment law 2011 BCSC 861

Hawkes v. Levelton Holdings Ltd.

The court granted an interim injunction preserving Hawkes’ shares pending trial, finding a serious issue on shareholder agreement interpretation and no adequate damages remedy.

  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Triggering event under buy-sell provisions
  • Interim injunction test (serious question, irreparable harm, balance of convenience)
  • Share transfer
  • Oppression remedy s.227 bca
  • Contract interpretation
Read case analysis
Civil C30461

Coopers & Byrand, Trustee v. Golden Quail Management

Article 9 must be read as a compulsory buy-sell provision because an overall reading avoids rendering the article meaningless; therefore the buy-sell applies and establishes that Mr Thadaney and Mr Harquail (and Golden Quail) are related to Green Gables. The Court varied Blair J.'s order to delete costs against McCague et al. and dismissed the remainder of the appeal with costs.

  • Shareholder agreement
  • Contract interpretation
  • Buy-sell provision
  • Compulsory buy-sell
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.