Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA redetermination requiring repayment of $2,000 CERB because the applicant also received EI-ERB for the same period.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA decision denying CRCB eligibility, finding the Officer acted reasonably and fairly under the statute.
The Federal Court upheld CRA decisions finding the applicant ineligible for CRB, CRSB and CWLB because workers’ compensation benefits were not eligible income.
Judicial review of CRA CERB and CRB eligibility decisions was allowed after conceded procedural unfairness, and the matter was remitted to a different decision-maker.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of CRA decisions finding the applicant ineligible for CERB and CRB, holding the statutory criteria were reasonably applied.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire de Mme Grandmont visant un refus de la PCRE, concluant que la décision de l’ARC était raisonnable et appuyée par le dossier.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a CRB eligibility refusal, finding the CRA officer’s decision reasonable and the later bank evidence inadmissible.
The court accepted the appellants' credible evidence that cash payments were made for the amounts shown on the ROEs and concluded that in the absence of any credible rebuttal evidence from the Crown, CRA's refusal to treat those ROE amounts as insurable earnings was unreasonable; therefore the appeals were allowed and the Minister's determinations were varied to reflect the ROE amounts.
Source excerpt
The Umpire correctly applied and was bound by the existing Revenue Canada determination that the applicant's employment was not insurable; because the employment was not insurable the applicant could not claim employment insurance benefits, and the procedural complaints did not merit relief (they were dismissed consistent with companion file A-135-03).
Source excerpt
Explore more
