R. v. Rajani
The court dismissed a summary conviction appeal after holding that a phone wedged in the driver’s lap still amounted to “use” under the Motor Vehicle Act.
- Distracted driving
- Use of electronic device while driving
- Interpretation of statutory definition of "use"
- Curative proviso (s.686(1)(b)(iii) criminal code)
- Standard of review for questions of law
- Distracted-driving