Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Le tribunal a rejeté une action en responsabilité du fait des produits après avoir conclu que les avertissements du produit étaient suffisants et que le demandeur ne les avait pas lus ni suivis.
Court ordered pre-certification cross-examination of one affiant in a class action, found material conflicts about warnings, and adjourned one application.
Van Dorn and Imperial Eastman owed a duty to warn Siemens of the specific risks of reusing repaired hoses; Siemens' inadequate maintenance did not negate the duty to warn; the trial judge's factual findings and apportionment (Siemens 15%) were not so clearly wrong as to warrant appellate interference; Imperial Eastman's catalogue warning did not address the specific risk and was inadequate; Imperial Eastman could not rely on the learned intermediary doctrine on the facts found. Therefore the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
