Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court held the employment relationship continued after a 2022 pay reduction, awarded eight months’ reasonable notice, and granted part of the wage and vacation claims.
The appeal was quashed because the Commissioner had no legal duty under the OLA or Federal Courts Rules to sign and return the French acknowledgement card, the Federal Court correctly concluded the Commissioner acknowledged receipt by bilingual email and offered to correspond in the appellant's preferred language, the Part III, V and VII allegations lacked a reasonable prospect of success or adequate factual pleading, and the appellant's affidavit was inadmissible on a motion to strike.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a spousal sponsorship refusal, finding the officer reasonably relied on credibility concerns, interview inconsistencies, and text messages.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the officer’s reasons on custodianship, study plan, transcripts, and finances were reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed a Privacy Act application as moot after finding the RCMP had already provided the requested disclosure.
The court admitted the claimant’s affidavit and mostly allowed retroactive child-related expense claims, including private school, childcare, counselling, and orthodontic costs.
Judicial review allowed. The Federal Court held that the CTSSP date-of-birth cutoff ending December 21, 1967 was unreasonable and set it aside.
The Court of Appeal affirmed dismissal under r.2.1.01: the claim was frivolous and vexatious, filed in the wrong jurisdiction, disclosed no cause of action and could not be cured by amendment; the motion judge properly refused affidavit evidence in the summary r.2.1.01 process and her discretionary decision was not clearly wrong or a misdirection.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, upholding adverse credibility findings, rejecting procedural fairness and counsel incompetence arguments, and declining certification.
The Federal Court granted judicial review, finding the migration officer’s refusal unreasonable for lack of transparency and justification and remitting the matter.
Explore more
