R. v. Lanktree
The appeal is dismissed because the sentencing judge did not err: a conditional sentence was inappropriate given the appellant's record and breaches; references to community drug harm were used legitimately to support denunciation and deterrence rather than as improper aggravation; and the sentencing judge properly exercised discretion in declining to award additional Duncan credit beyond Summers credit given that much PSC resulted from re-offending while on release.
Source excerpt
- Conditional sentence
- Pre-sentence custody credit
- Duncan credit
- Summers credit
- Drug trafficking
- Aggravation and mitigation