Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court found the parties cohabited from September 2002, divided family property equally, rejected excluded-property and unequal-division claims, denied spousal support, and granted divorce.
The appeal was allowed in part: the Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's factual finding that the appellant retained the precious metals but corrected arithmetic errors in the post‑separation adjustment calculation, holding the appropriate adjustment is one half of the metals value ($157,472.50) and varying the trial order to substitute the corrected adjusted equalization payment ($168,282.39) and corrected net payment after deductions ($145,584.85); the late motion for injunction and security for costs was dismissed and there was no costs order.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court granted an ex parte jeopardy order allowing the Minister of National Revenue to collect immediately on reassessed CERS amounts.
Family law trial on property division, spousal support, retroactive child support, and allegations of family violence between former spouses.
The court awarded fraud damages, punitive damages and a constructive trust, ordered a tracing inquiry, found Wook Jin Jung in contempt of a Mareva order, and denied special costs.
The court dismissed a corporate defendant’s application for security for costs and granted the plaintiff partial document disclosure in a fraudulent conveyance dispute.
The court dismissed a fraudulent conveyance challenge to transfers made under separation agreements, finding valuable consideration and no proof that Ms. He was privy to any fraud.
The court struck the defendants’ pleadings for repeated failure to comply with disclosure and production orders, and granted related restorative relief over properties and shares.
The court partly varied a freezing injunction, allowing release of the lesser of $8,800 or the BMO account balance for legal expenses, but denied other relief.
Family law dispute over property division and divorce. The court found the parties resumed a marriage from 1996 to 2006 and reapportioned assets unevenly under s. 65.
Explore more
