Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Capacity and guardianship 2023 BCSC 1841

Kierans (Re)

The court appointed Margaret M. Kierans committee of Paul Bernard Kierans’ person and estate, finding she best protected his interests and remained closely involved in his care.

  • Appointment of committee
  • Best interests test
  • Representation agreement
  • Medical incapacity affidavits
  • Solicitor-client privilege/return of documents
  • Committeeship
Read case analysis
Corporate law 2023 BCSC 404

Ren v. Eastern Platinum Limited

The court refused leave for the derivative action as filed, but held the matter was not an abuse of process and allowed a narrowed claim against Diana Hu to be resubmitted.

  • Derivative action
  • Leave to commence suit
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Negligence by directors
  • Good faith requirement
  • Best interests test
Read case analysis
Personal injury C32618

Chesher v. Monaghan

The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial judge's refusal to convert the award to a structured periodic payment because under s.116 the court must order periodic payments only if they are in the plaintiff's best interests given all circumstances; here the plaintiff's credible financial plan, the material reduction in immediate cash under the defendant's proposal, the proposal's lack of guarantees, limited indexation tied to CPI and structural inflexibility justified refusing the defendant's offer; trial judge did not err procedurally in declining to re-craft the defendant's proposal and the appe…

  • Section 116 courts of justice act
  • Structured settlement
  • Gross-up for tax on investment income
  • Future care costs
  • Best interests test
  • Discount rate (rule 53.09)
Read case analysis
Health law C30924, C31005, C31005, C31972, C31972

T., I. v. L., L.

The Court of Appeal held that findings of the Consent and Capacity Board on whether there was an applicable prior capable wish and on the incapable person’s best interests are reviewed on a reasonableness standard; applying that standard the Board’s findings that there was no applicable prior capable wish and that the prescribed medication was in the patient’s best interests (and that the SDM failed to comply with s.21) were reasonable and the appeal was dismissed.

  • Consent and capacity
  • Substitute decision-making
  • Best interests test
  • Standard of review
  • Statutory appeal powers
  • Expert tribunal deference
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.