Federal Court granted judicial review of CRA denials of CERB and CRB to Bianca Potvin, finding the reasons insufficiently transparent and remitting the matter for reconsideration.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA second review decision denying CERB, CRB, and CWLB, finding the decision reasonable and procedurally fair.
The Federal Court found CRA benefit ineligibility decisions unreasonable and procedurally unfair, then quashed them and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The Federal Court granted judicial review on procedural fairness grounds, remitting a CERB/CRB eligibility decision for redetermination by a different decision maker.
The CRA's written July 25, 2024 decisions were reasonable: the CRA officer reasonably concluded Mr. Li did not demonstrate at least $5,000 of net self-employment income for the relevant periods, properly declined to rely on the documentation provided without additional proof of actual income, and the ITA attribution rules do not change the distinct statutory eligibility requirements for CERB and CRB; the review process was procedurally fair.
The Federal Court dismissed Paul James Yates’s judicial review, upholding CRA decisions finding him ineligible for CERB and CRB for failure to prove $5,000 in eligible income.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of CERB and CRB second-review decisions, finding the CRA’s income assessment reasonable and procedurally fair.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review challenging CERB, CRB and CRCB ineligibility decisions, finding the process fair and the officer’s reasoning reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of CRA correspondence refusing a late second review of CERB eligibility and confirming prior final CRB/CWLB decisions.
Judicial review of CRA second-review denials of CERB, CRB, and CWLB was dismissed. The Court held the decisions reasonable and found no breach of procedural fairness.