Eyles v. Eyles
Applying the Gronnerud test the decisive criterion was whether the nominee was qualified, prepared and indifferent; evidence established Mr. Colin Allan Millar met that test (qualified as retired family lawyer, prepared to act pro bono, no demonstrated conflict or adverse interest), whereas Ms. McIntosh lacked evidentiary support of qualifications and independence; PGT cannot be compelled to act; accordingly the court appointed Millar as litigation guardian and awarded costs to the claimant.
Source excerpt
- Litigation guardian appointment
- Capacity assessment
- Conflict of interest/indifference
- Public guardian and trustee liability/refusal
- Costs