Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law 2020 BCSC 167

R. v. Banks Island Gold Inc.

Appeal from a regulatory-environmental prosecution. The court addressed Charter challenges to inspections, statements, a spill report, and Jordan delay.

  • Charter s.7 self-incrimination
  • Charter s.8 search and seizure
  • Charter s.10 detention and right to counsel
  • Admissibility of compelled regulatory statements
  • Statutorily compelled reports
  • Voir dire procedure
Read case analysis
Tax law 2011 FCA 85

Long v. Canada

The Tax Court judge did not err in exercising her discretion to deny full disclosure and to require partial disclosure under rule 81 at this interlocutory stage because the motion was premature, no imminent Charter breach was established, existing procedural protections reduce the risk of self-incrimination, and appellate intervention is unwarranted absent a demonstrable error of law or wrong principle.

  • Disclosure
  • Partial disclosure (rule 81)
  • Full disclosure (rule 82)
  • Charter s.7 self-incrimination
  • Unilateral disclosure
  • Interlocutory appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law C35927

R. v. D'Amour

T4 slips were pre-existing documents independent of state compulsion and their production and subsequent use to prosecute welfare fraud did not engage the s.7 protection against self-incrimination; given the applicant's undertaking to disclose income for eligibility, she had no reasonable expectation of privacy under s.8 that would prohibit the Department from providing those records to prosecutorial authorities; conviction therefore stands though the probation term ordering monthly $100 payments toward restitution was removed.

  • Charter s.7 self-incrimination
  • Charter s.8 search and seizure
  • Evidence exclusion s.24(2)
  • Welfare fraud
  • Sentencing — restitution and probation
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [1999] 2 SCR 417

R. v. White

The Supreme Court held that statements made under compulsion of British Columbia’s Motor Vehicle Act were inadmissible in related criminal proceedings.

  • Charter s.7 self-incrimination
  • Use immunity
  • Admissibility of compelled statements
  • Motor vehicle act s.61
  • Right to counsel s.10(b)
  • Exclusion of evidence s.24(1)
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.