Pacifica Mortgage Investment Corporation v. 2490 Marine Drive Ltd.
The court granted the appointment of a receiver (MNP Ltd.) because the Maple Trade factors and equitable considerations favored receivership: the Debtors abandoned the project, there is imminent prejudice from expiry of the development permit and high interest accrual, asset preservation and public safety concerns existed, no adequate or timely alternative step had been taken by the second mortgagee, and a receiver could protect stakeholders. The receiver's powers were limited (no unilateral payment to Pacifica without leave; borrowing capped at $500,000) to preserve judicial supervision.
Source excerpt
- Appointment of receiver
- Foreclosure
- Conduct of sale
- Reverse vesting order
- Priority of security
- Judicial supervision of receivership