Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Court fixed expropriation compensation at $39,541,237.50, rejected a $450,000 deduction for Mainland’s leasehold, and awarded costs to S&R.
The Director proved arrears of $17,251.12 as of Dec 18, 2024; the respondent failed to prove inability to pay or a valid reason for default and did not provide full disclosure or credible evidence of diligent efforts to comply; accordingly, under s.37(3) MEA the court ordered a reporting obligation, ongoing prospective payments of $200/month, additional $250/month toward arrears commencing June 30, 2025, intermittent 30‑day imprisonment on default, issuance of warrant on sworn notice, costs of $664.10, and judgment for arrears and costs totalling $17,915.22 with interest at 5% per annum.
Source excerpt
Adjudicator accepted the claimant's evidence as more credible, found the defendant performed incomplete and defective work and abandoned the project, calculated the monetary value of materials and usable labour ($14,500), determined claimant overpaid by $7,600, allowed remediation costs reduced to $9,000, awarded simple interest on the overpayment and nominal general damages, and ordered costs to be proven; these findings and apportionments formed the basis for judgment.
Source excerpt
The court held the parties were bound by a consent order capping the respondent’s 2022 Guidelines income at $500,000 and fixed the claimant’s at $1,000.
The court held that the buyers failed to prove breach, fraud, or bad faith in a share sale of RSK. The DPLA was in default and the guarantees and mortgage were enforceable.
The court rejected an alleged oral profit-sharing contract, but found unjust enrichment and granted a quantum meruit award, while also finding improper CPL filings.
Where parties contracted on a time-and-materials basis an initial guesstimate does not bind the contractor as a fixed price but is a relevant factor in assessing whether charges are reasonable; the contractor has a duty to limit time and account for hours and materials and, where the bill is excessive, the court may deduct hours to reach a reasonable amount. The claimant's invoice was reduced by $3,335.00 and judgment entered for the reduced sum plus costs without interest.
Source excerpt
The court granted judgment to the plaintiff for the unpaid share-purchase price and interest, rejecting duress and misrepresentation arguments.
The court enforced a settlement agreement over Powell River properties, found valid consideration and no unconscionability, and awarded $295,812.50 plus interest.
The court granted possession to the landlord, rejected the respondents’ lease-extension argument, awarded rent arrears with interest, and denied double rent.
Explore more
