Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD decision, holding it reasonable to reject speculative links between a Philippines murder and Pakistani extremists.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, finding no procedural fairness breach and no unreasonableness in the Mumbai and Bengaluru internal flight alternative findings.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding no unreasonableness in its refusal of protection under s. 97 of the IRPA.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, holding the applicants failed to show the internal flight alternative finding was unreasonable.
The Federal Court denied judicial review of a refusal based on serious criminality inadmissibility, finding the process fair and the decision reasonable.
The RAD allowed the appeal, finding on the balance of probabilities that the threats and attempted kidnapping were linked to the brother-in-law's whistleblowing activities, creating an imputed political opinion nexus; because the persecutors are likely connected to state agents, state protection and a viable internal flight alternative are unavailable, and therefore the appellants are Convention refugees.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding the applicant had not shown a personalized risk under section 97 of the IRPA.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision finding a viable internal flight alternative in Kandy, Sri Lanka.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding no procedural fairness breach, no reviewable factual error, and a reasonable BIOC analysis.
The court found the appellant credible and accepted his evidence and supporting documents that he intended the property to be his primary place of residence at the time he became liable under the purchase agreement and that he occupied the property from January to July 2011; accordingly he satisfied the statutory conditions for the federal and Ontario new housing rebates and the assessment was set aside and referred back for reconsideration and reassessment.
Source excerpt
Explore more
