Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2022 BCSC 1909

R. v. Ali

Pre-trial disclosure application dismissed: the accused failed to show a non-speculative nexus between proposed third-party suspects and the homicide.

  • Third-party suspects
  • O'connor disclosure
  • Stinchcombe disclosure
  • Viclas
  • Dna identification
  • Admissibility
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 942

R. v. Ali

In this pre-trial Stinchcombe disclosure ruling, the court dismissed a defence request for all investigative material, holding that clearly irrelevant material need not be disclosed.

  • First-party disclosure
  • Stinchcombe doctrine
  • Fruits of the investigation
  • Relevance
  • Alternate suspect evidence
  • Privilege
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 ONCA 602

R. v. Selvanayagam

The trial judge's failure to give an O'Connor instruction was not prejudicial because there was independent evidence from which the jury could infer fabrication of particular denials; although the trial judge erred in saying prior exculpatory statements were not evidence unless adopted at trial, that legal error was harmless given the overwhelming DNA evidence placing the appellant at the scene and corroborating records; applying the proviso, the appeal is dismissed and the conviction is upheld.

  • Dna identification
  • Jury instructions
  • O'connor instruction
  • Consciousness of guilt
  • Prior inconsistent statements
  • Harmless error/proviso
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2008 ONCA 414

R. v. Edwards

The Court dismissed both appeals, holding the trial judge did not err in declining a dangerous offender designation and instead imposing a fifteen year fixed term consecutive to the existing sentence plus a ten year long-term supervision order; the trial judge properly weighed psychiatric and institutional reports, did not rely exclusively on group statistical evidence nor shift the onus to the Crown, and reasonably concluded there was a substantial risk of reoffending but a reasonable possibility of eventual control given the offender’s age and supervision conditions.

  • Dangerous offender designation
  • Long-term offender designation
  • Totality principle
  • Age-related recidivism
  • Expert psychiatric evidence
  • Dna identification
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2003 NSCA 62

R. v. Clancey

The trial judge erred in law by treating Jordan as precluding DNA orders for past offences and by failing to consider mandatory factors under s.487.052(2) (notably the respondent's significant prior record and the minimal demonstrated privacy intrusion); on the record a DNA order was appropriate, so the appeal is allowed and the matter remitted for issuance of the s.487.052 order.

  • Dna identification
  • S.487.052 criminal code
  • Dna identification act
  • Standard of review for discretionary orders
  • Retrospective dna orders (cold crimes)
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.