Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law 2023 FC 1695

Rahman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IAD inadmissibility decision, upholding findings that the BNP engaged in terrorism and subversion by force.

  • Inadmissibility under irpa s.34(1)(f)
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Subversion by force
  • Membership in organization
  • Immigration-law
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Immigration 2022 FC 1489

Béké v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court allowed judicial review of an immigration inadmissibility decision, finding the officer unreasonably conflated violence with terrorism and failed a required temporal analysis.

  • Inadmissibility
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Temporal analysis of membership
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2022 FC 510

Babu v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Judicial review of an Immigration Division security inadmissibility finding was granted because the tribunal did not adequately analyze specific intent during the applicant’s membership.

  • Inadmissibility under s.34(1)(f) irpa
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Specific intent requirement
  • Temporal scope of organizational membership
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Irpa-s-34-1-f
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2018 FC 480

Kamal v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)

Judicial review of an IRPA inadmissibility finding was dismissed. The Court upheld the Immigration Division’s rulings on expert evidence, bias, membership, and terrorism.

  • Inadmissibility under irpa s34
  • Membership in organization
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Standard of review (reasonableness vs correctness)
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
  • Admission of expert evidence
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2017 FC 182

Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an inadmissibility decision, holding there was no procedural unfairness and the terrorism finding was reasonable.

  • Inadmissibility under s.34(1)(f) and (c)
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Ministerial relief
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2012 FC 802

Miguel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court allowed judicial review, finding the officer reasonably held FLEC engaged in terrorism, but erred in treating the applicant’s limited support as membership.

  • Inadmissibility under paragraph 34(1)(f) irpa
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Membership in an organization
  • Reasonable grounds standard
  • Judicial review
  • Humanitarian and compassionate grounds
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2011 FC 246

Ibrahim Dirar v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court allowed judicial review of an immigration inadmissibility finding, holding the Board unreasonably characterized JEM as a terrorist organization.

  • Inadmissibility under s.34(1)(f) irpa
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Membership of organization
  • Standard of review — reasonableness
  • Evidentiary assessment
  • Immigration-inadmissibility
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2010 FC 781

Rizwan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court upheld an inadmissibility finding under s. 34(1)(f) IRPA, holding that the officer reasonably found MQM-A engaged in terrorism during the applicant’s membership.

  • Inadmissibility under s.34(1)(f) irpa
  • Definition of terrorism
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Membership in proscribed/terrorist organization
  • Credibility and evidence assessment
  • Immigration-inadmissibility
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.