R. v. Kwok
The appeal is allowed and a new trial ordered because the trial judge relied materially on dates and viewing metadata that were derived solely from a Digital Forensic Report that was not admitted into evidence; those non‑evidentiary dates played an essential part of the judge’s reasoning that the appellant had knowledge and control of the illicit material, producing a miscarriage of justice notwithstanding that admissible evidence could have supported conviction.
Source excerpt
- Child pornography offences
- Possession of child pornography
- Knowledge and control
- Circumstantial evidence
- Misapprehension of evidence
- Lay opinion evidence