Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2483

R. v. Newby

The court allowed a Crown appeal in a violation-ticket case, holding disclosure in this context is triggered by a timely request and may affect Jordan delay attribution.

  • Section 11(b) charter delay (jordan)
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Summary conviction procedure
  • Defence delay attribution
  • Section-11b-charter-delay
  • Disclosure-obligations
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 FC 223

Canada (Attorney General) v. Bilali-Mtemi

The Federal Court confirmed a Canada Evidence Act s. 38 non-disclosure order for redacted MONUSCO information, finding injury to international relations and national security.

  • Canada evidence act s.38 third-party rule
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Public interest balancing
  • Amicus curiae in classified proceedings
  • Canada-evidence-act-s-38
  • Third-party-rule
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 1635

R. v. Haevischer

The court dismissed most of the defence disclosure request in support of a proposed abuse-of-process stay, but allowed a limited re-opening and ordered revised redacted materials disclosed.

  • Witness protection program
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Third party production (o'connor)
  • Public interest privilege
  • Allegation of perjury
  • Abuse of process doctrine
Read case analysis
National security law 2024 FC 716

Canada (Attorney General) v. MacDonald

The Federal Court partly granted an Attorney General application under the Canada Evidence Act, confirming non-disclosure of sensitive national security information while permitting limited public summaries.

  • Canada evidence act s38 applications
  • Non-disclosure orders
  • Classified information
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Public interest immunity
  • Deconfliction
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 NSSC 304

R. v. Atwell

Because the applicant failed to particularize any specific redaction or to demonstrate a reasonable possibility that the redacted personal information would assist his exercise of the right to make full answer and defence, and the Crown had provided contact information for many witnesses under an undertaking, there was no established infringement of s.7 and the application was dismissed.

  • Right to full answer and defence
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Personal information redactions
  • Undertakings
Read case analysis
National security law 2022 FC 142

Canada (Attorney General) v. Ortis

The Federal Court confirmed section 38 Canada Evidence Act non-disclosure claims over classified information in Cameron Ortis’s case, while allowing controlled disclosure to the trial judge.

  • Canada evidence act s38 regime
  • Security of information act (soia) offences
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Public interest immunity / injurious disclosure
  • Fair trial and right to make full answer and defence
  • Ribic three-step test
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCCA 34

R. v. Johnston

The Court of Appeal upheld most trial findings in the Surrey Six murders appeal, but quashed the convictions and remitted the stay applications for an evidentiary hearing.

  • Stay of proceedings
  • Informer privilege
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Abuse of process (babos)
  • Party liability (s.21)
  • Circumstantial evidence and inferences
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCCA 315

R. v. Frigon

Appeal from an assault conviction dismissed. The court found a disclosure breach, but no realistic possibility it affected the verdict, and no ineffective assistance.

  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Fresh evidence (palmer)
  • Credibility assessment (w.(d.))
  • Miscarriage of justice s.686(1)(a)(iii)
  • Expert evidence admissibility (white burgess)
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 1028

R. v. Alkhalil

The court declined to hold an evidentiary hearing on a lost-email Charter claim, finding the Email was not material to the narrowed ITO/Garofoli issues.

  • Lost evidence
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Search warrant/ito (garofoli)
  • Charter s.7 and s.11(d)
  • Excision remedy
  • Publication ban s.648(1) criminal code
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 189

R. v. Chan

The court found a s. 7 Charter breach after police viewed relevant security video during a drug investigation but failed to preserve several clips needed for full answer and defence.

  • Section 7 charter
  • Disclosure obligations (stinchcombe)
  • Third‑party production (o'connor)
  • Police duty to preserve evidence
  • Lost evidence
  • Search warrant / information to obtain
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.