Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 534

R. v. S.A.M.

The court denied a defence adjournment of a voir dire on third-party MCFD records, finding the request unreasonable given prior delay, an imminent jury trial, and known issues that had not been pursued earlier.

  • Adjournment
  • Disclosure of third-party records
  • Voir dire
  • Publication ban
  • Legal aid funding
  • Timeliness and diligence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 SCC 3

R. v. Deslauriers

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the Crown’s appeal and upheld a new trial after finding errors in disclosure, evidence assessment, and expert testimony.

  • Disclosure of third-party records
  • Admissibility of expert testimony
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • New trial
  • Recusal
  • Disclosure
Read case analysis
Family law 2020 NSSC 257

Doncaster v. Field

The application to expand access is dismissed because the applicant did not establish the requisite material or pivotal change in circumstances since the Court of Appeal order; alternatively, on the merits the evidence demonstrates that increased access would not be in the best interests of the children given their ages, maturity, expressed wishes (lack of response), and stable, supportive living arrangements; existing corollary relief orders and Court of Appeal provisions remain in force, including restriction on access to third-party records; costs awarded and a 12‑month bar on filing a not…

  • Access variation
  • Best interests of the child
  • Maximum contact principle
  • Change in circumstances
  • Voice of the child
  • Disclosure of third-party records
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 NSSC 342

R. v. Bonvie

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to establish likely relevance for narrative records under s.278.3(4) and case law; although treatment records narrowly addressing causation of the complainant's hemorrhoids met the Stage 1 threshold, judicial review of the sealed records at Stage 2 found no portions that were likely relevant or necessary in the interests of justice, so no records were produced and the records were resealed.

  • Section 278 production
  • Disclosure of third-party records
  • Sane reports
  • Relevance
  • Stage 1 and stage 2 analysis
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 2666

R. v. Jancey

The court dismissed an application for disclosure of PRIME metadata, finding the defence had not shown sufficient relevance. It ordered a review for any missing officer text statements.

  • Disclosure of third-party records
  • Prime system metadata
  • Stinchcombe/o'connor relevance test
  • Right to full answer and defence
  • Balancing privacy and disclosure
  • Criminal-disclosure
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2007 BCSC 2037

R. v. Pickton

The court ordered limited disclosure of Money Mart records relating to Crown witness Lynn Ellingsen, with redactions to protect unrelated personal and banking information.

  • Disclosure of third‑party records
  • O'connor test
  • Banking/financial records
  • Witness credibility
  • Redaction and production
  • Third-party-records
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.