Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 2043

Bajwa v. Y&Y Enterprises Ltd.

The court granted an application to exclude disbursements for three proposed expert reports under the Regulation, finding a reasonable risk of exceeding the cap and undue hardship.

  • Expert disbursements
  • Disbursement cap
  • Undue hardship
  • Independent medical examination
  • Expert-disbursements
  • Disbursement-cap
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2020 ONCA 465

Fuller v. Aphria Inc.

The disbursement to the appellants' expert was not recoverable because the evidence was essentially mathematical calculations based on publicly available share price data that did not constitute expert opinion or make a meaningful contribution to the damages assessment; disallowing the disbursement is not a distributive costs order.

  • Expert disbursements
  • Costs assessment
  • Damages assessment
  • Distributive costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2013 BCCA 17

Lee v. Jarvie

The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal on whether Rule 14-1(15) allows costs apportionment by heads of damages or other discrete matters.

  • Apportionment of costs
  • Interpretation of rule 14-1(15)
  • Expert disbursements
  • Leave to appeal
  • Apportionment-of-costs
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2012 BCSC 1588

Service Corporation International (Canada) Ltd. (Graham Funeral Ltd.) v. Nunes-Pottinger Funeral Services & Crematorium Ltd.

Costs ruling after judgment in a confidential-information dispute: the plaintiff remained the successful party, apportionment was refused, and expert disbursements were recoverable.

  • Misuse of confidential information
  • Damages assessment
  • Costs allocation
  • Expert disbursements
  • Apportionment under rules
  • Refusal to admit facts
Read case analysis
Property law 2004 NSSC 93

Ward v. Babin

Defendants interfered with the plaintiff's right-of-way by in-filling which increased flooding duration; interference warranted compensatory (general) damages but not punitive damages because the defendants acted with benign intent; court awarded $4,000 general damages, party-and-party costs of $9,500, allowed engineer disbursements of $17,986 and surveyor $920, and dismissed the defendants' counter-claim.

  • Right-of-way
  • Nuisance (flooding)
  • Restoration/remedial work
  • Expert disbursements
  • Punitive damages
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.