Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2592

R. v. Khouchaba

The court accepted a joint sentencing submission and imposed a 3-year global jail term for unlawful possession of a loaded prohibited firearm and a prohibited magazine.

  • Possession of prohibited firearm
  • Possession of prohibited device (magazine)
  • Joint sentencing submission
  • Firearms prohibition order
  • Dna designation order
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 1672

R. v. Draves

The court accepted a joint sentencing submission and imposed a 10-year global sentence for drug trafficking and firearms offences, with credit for pretrial custody and ancillary orders.

  • Trafficking
  • Possession
  • Firearms possession and prohibition
  • Credit for pretrial custody
  • Joint sentencing submission
  • Totality principle
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 BCSC 2151

R. v. Kazakoff

Sentencing reasons for a drug-trafficking and ammunition case: the accused received a five-year global term for the present offences, consecutive to an existing sentence.

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking
  • Possession of ammunition contrary to prohibition
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
  • Victim fine surcharge relief
  • Totality principle
  • Gladue factors
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 908

R. v. Monteith

The court accepted a joint submission and sentenced Carlos Nathaniel Monteith to an effective 6.5 years in jail for firearm offences, with ancillary firearms and DNA orders.

  • Discharging firearm with intent to wound, maim or disfigure
  • Unlawful possession of a loaded firearm
  • Joint submission on sentence
  • Victim impact
  • Forfeiture of offence‑related property
  • Firearms prohibition order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 ONCA 750

R. v. Hobeika

The Court held the searches of the Liberty Village condominium and the vehicle were lawful; the warrantless entry and safety sweep of the Etobicoke condominium were authorized by s.11(7) CDSA because the police had probable cause and exigent circumstances; Hobeika's s.10(b) right to counsel was breached by an unreasonable delay but, on a Grant s.24(2) analysis, the evidence obtained in the searches was admissible; convictions, sentences and forfeiture orders were upheld and appeals dismissed.

  • Search and seizure
  • Section 8 charter
  • Section 10(b) right to counsel
  • Section 24(2) exclusion of evidence
  • Section 11(7) cdsa exigent circumstances
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 177

R. v. Downes

Sentencing reasons for voyeurism convictions: the court imposed a suspended sentence and six months’ probation, waived the victim surcharge, and ordered forfeiture or scrubbing of devices.

  • Voyeurism (s.162(1)(a))
  • Pre-sentence reports
  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Collateral consequences/publicity
  • Police conduct
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 NSCA 1

R. v. Desmond

The sentencing judge failed to perform the statutory analyses required by s.487.051(3) for a DNA order and s.490.41(3)/490.1 for forfeiture, and the March 12, 2019 written reasons could not be treated as a substantive revision of the oral decision after a notice of appeal; the Court of Appeal therefore conducted the required statutory analyses itself, concluded the circumstances supported granting a DNA order and ordering forfeiture of the vehicle, and allowed the Crown's appeal.

  • Dna orders
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
  • Ancillary orders
  • Alteration of written reasons after oral decision
  • Standard of review for discretionary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 NSSC 274

R. v. Howe

Judge held that objectionable factual material in PSRs must be disregarded; offender statements and counsel representations may include hearsay only if not disputed or proved per ss.723–724; extortion was the dominant predicate offence and, after weighing aggravating factors (including s.718.2(a)(iv)) and mitigation, imposed custodial sentences of 3 years (James), 2 years (Howe) and 18 months (Pearce) on predicate extortion then reallocated to avoid double counting by downsizing predicate sentences and adding consecutive s.467.12 terms resulting in final totals: James 3 years (2+1), Howe 2 ye…

  • Extortion
  • Uttering threats
  • Intimidation
  • Pre-sentence reports admissibility
  • Criminal organization offences (s.467.12)
  • Consecutive sentencing (s.467.14)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 823

R. v. Yu

The court imposed concurrent one-year sentences for cannabis production and possession for trafficking, plus forfeiture, firearms prohibitions, and a victim surcharge.

  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Production of cannabis
  • Possession for purpose of trafficking
  • Forfeiture of offence-related property
  • Ancillary orders (firearms/dna/victim surcharge)
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 1275

R. v. Charette

Sentencing reasons for low-level Schedule I drug trafficking, with jail, probation, DNA, forfeiture, and a firearms prohibition imposed after credit for pre-sentence custody.

  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking
  • Sentencing principles (denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation)
  • Pre-sentence custody credit
  • Brain injury as mitigation
  • Conditional/suspended sentence suitability
  • Dna orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.