Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court found the RADâs risk analysis unreasonable because it did not meaningfully engage with the applicantâs evidence about his familyâs links to the Gaddafi regime.
Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a RAD decision, finding the assessment of consultant competence, new evidence, and forward-looking risk in Romania reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding its assessment of intersectionality, credibility, and future risk was reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed four brothersâ judicial review of a refusal of privately sponsored refugee permanent residence, finding the officerâs credibility findings reasonable and the process fair.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a PRRA decision, finding the officer unreasonably focused on missing corroboration and failed to assess forward-looking persecution risk.
The appeal is dismissed because the RAD found the new evidence was not admissible (it arose before the RPD decision or was reasonably available) and, on a balance of probabilities, the appellant failed to establish her SOGIESC identity or a forward-looking risk of persecution; material omissions in the BOC and lack of corroboration fatally undermined credibility.
Source excerpt
Appeal dismissed because, after admitting the late affidavits, the adjudicator found that the appellant failed to demonstrate a serious possibility of persecution or, on balance of probabilities, a risk of section 97(1) harm given (1) credibility deficits and lack of corroboration, (2) absence of individualized aggravating factors or political profile, and (3) country evidence that Hoa Hao followers without a political profile generally can practice without persecution.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding no procedural fairness, evidentiary, or reasonableness error.
Judicial review of a PRRA refusal was dismissed. The Court found no procedural unfairness, no right to an oral hearing, and no reviewable error in the forward-looking risk analysis.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a negative PRRA decision, holding the officer reasonably relied on current country reports and conducted a forward-looking risk assessment.
Explore more
