LaFramboise v. Kaisersingh
The motion judge's critical factual findings—that Mr. Pomer was aware of the appellant's action prior to signing the release, that the appellant was aware of the assessment proceeding by July 2014 and did not seek to be added, and that the respondents could rely on the appellant's counsel's representation—were supported by the evidence; therefore there was no material non-disclosure or fraudulent representation and summary judgment dismissing the appellant's action was properly granted.
Source excerpt
- Summary judgment
- Non-disclosure
- Fraudulent representation
- Assessment of accounts
- Release of account