Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 1126

R. v. D.K.M.

Sentencing decision for historic child sexual offences and bestiality committed against the accused’s granddaughters, resulting in a 7.5-year custody term.

  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Bestiality (s.160(3))
  • Sentencing principles
  • Soira registration
  • Totality principle
  • Position of trust
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 1467

R. v. D.K.M.

Trial judgment on multiple sexual offence charges against a grandfather. The court convicted on five counts and acquitted on one count.

  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Bestiality (s.160(3))
  • Indecent acts (s.173)
  • Mens rea and recklessness
  • W.(d.) credibility framework
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 NSSC 85

R. v. W.C.C.

Although the normal custodial range for these child sexual offences was 4–6 years per Friesen, the sentencing judge gave significant weight to Gladue factors and the low assessed risk of reoffending and imposed a diminished, fit sentence of 3 years imprisonment in a federal institution; ancillary orders were granted (weapons prohibition, DNA, SOIRA) and the s.161(1) prohibition order was refused as unnecessary in the unique circumstances; the sexual assault conviction was stayed pursuant to the rule against multiple convictions and the victim surcharge was waived.

  • Sentencing
  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Sexual assault (s.271)
  • Gladue principles
  • Friesen guidance
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCCA 13

R. v. P.R.J.

The Court of Appeal upheld the finding that taking a child’s hand to the accused’s genitals could amount to invitation to sexual touching, but stayed that count under Kienapple.

  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Sexual assault (s.271)
  • Kienapple principle (multiple convictions)
  • Misapprehension of evidence
  • Child witness evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 NSSC 376

R. v. Hughes

Applying Friesen, the court concluded that denunciation and deterrence require a mid-single digit penitentiary term for repeated sexual interference and invitation to sexual touching of a vulnerable child by a trusted adult; the offender's advanced age and health were considered but no evidence showed incarceration would endanger him or preclude treatment, so they did not outweigh aggravating factors. The appropriate global sentence is six years' imprisonment on s.151, with the s.152 sentence concurrent; the s.271 count is stayed under Kienapple. Mandatory and discretionary ancillary orders w…

  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Sexual assault (s.271)
  • Kienapple principle
  • Friesen sentencing guidance
  • Ancillary orders (dna, firearms, soira)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2019 BCSC 2099

R. v. Norberg

The court convicted Michael Norberg of invitation to sexual touching and unlawful confinement, accepting the complainant’s evidence and rejecting his denial.

  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Unlawful confinement (s.279(2))
  • Credibility assessment of child complainant
  • Admission and use of prior statements
  • Publication ban
  • Sexual-touching
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2019 BCSC 1399

R. v. Morin

The court sentenced Robert Russel Joseph Morin to three years for sexual offences involving a 13-year-old, with concurrent terms, custody credit, and a concurrent one-month breach sentence.

  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Sexual assault (s.271)
  • Sentencing principles
  • Gladue / s.718.2(e) considerations
  • Publication ban s.486.4
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 NSSC 353

R v. MacLellan

A suspended sentence with two years probation is fit and proper given the offender's youth, lack of prior record, guilty plea and remorse; mandatory ancillary orders (DNA and SOIRA) are granted; a s.161 order prohibiting presence at school grounds and internet contact with those under 16 is granted for five years; a s.109 firearms prohibition is declined because the offence (s.152 invitation to sexual touching) did not meet the statutory requirement that violence be used, threatened or attempted in this case.

  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Suspended sentence
  • Probation
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Dna order
  • Sex offender information registration (soira)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 1868

R. v. T.L.P.

The court found T.L.P. to be a dangerous offender, imposed an 11-year aggregate sentence, and ordered a 10-year Long Term Supervision Order with ancillary lifetime conditions.

  • Dangerous offender
  • Long-term offender
  • Long term supervision order
  • Sexual interference (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Kienapple doctrine
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 888

R. v. Campbell

The British Columbia Supreme Court dismissed Mr. Campbell’s appeal, upholding convictions for touching for a sexual purpose and invitation to sexual touching.

  • Sexual assault
  • Touching for a sexual purpose (s.151)
  • Invitation to sexual touching (s.152)
  • Intoxication defence
  • Conditional stay / kienapple
  • Standard of review - unreasonable verdict
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.