N. G. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
General Division erred in law by holding that knowledge and consent can be acquired after fraudulent acts; however, on the evidence (access provided, suspicious deposit patterns, failure to investigate or report, inconsistent testimony) the Claimant had knowledge of or consented to the ex‑boyfriend's fraud or was willfully blind to it, so the Appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Employment insurance overpayment
- Identity theft allegations
- Knowledge and consent
- Willful blindness
- Penalty and serious violation
- Standard of review on appeal