Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2511

R. v. Majcher

The court dismissed William Robert Majcher’s application for disclosure or production of FPNS records, holding the records were third-party operational materials and not likely relevant.

  • First-party disclosure (stinchcombe)
  • Third-party production (o'connor)
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Information sharing and caveats
  • Deconfliction (one vision)
  • Criminal-disclosure
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 2011

R. v. Ali

On a voir dire, the court refused third-party disclosure of RCMP records about Mustafa Ahmad, finding the defence theory of police agency remained speculative.

  • Disclosure (stinchcombe/o'connor)
  • Police agent status
  • Right to counsel (s.10 charter)
  • Liberty and security (s.7 charter)
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Third‑party records
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 997

R. v. Baker

The court dismissed an O'Connor application for the RCMP Mackenzie file, finding the accused had not shown the requested records were likely relevant.

  • O'connor third‑party records
  • Production of third‑party records
  • Credibility impeachment
  • Stinchcombe disclosure
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Oconnor-third-party-records
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 NSSC 371

R. v. R.R.D.G.

The judge concluded the defence did not establish on a case‑specific evidentiary foundation that the requested IWK, Roth Associates (JB one‑time contacts and MR ongoing therapy) and January 2007 DCS case recording were likely relevant to an issue at trial or, alternatively, that production was necessary in the interests of justice. The therapeutic records have high privacy expectations and low probative value in the circumstances; the accused already had significant disclosure (police statements, videotaped interview, preliminary inquiry cross‑examination) and elected not to call or fully exa…

  • Production of third‑party records
  • Section 278 criminal code regime
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Therapeutic/counselling records
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 BCSC 946

R. v. Groves

The court dismissed a defence application for PRIME and PIRS police records, holding the request was for third-party records and had not met O'Connor likely relevance.

  • Third party disclosure
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Stinchcombe disclosure
  • O'connor procedure
  • Mcneil clarification
  • Third-party-disclosure
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2009 BCSC 1340

R. v. Basi

The court dismissed a defence bid to compel Patrick Kinsella to testify and issue a subpoena in a third-party records application, holding the O'Connor threshold must be met on the filed materials.

  • Third-party records
  • O'connor disclosure
  • Subpoena duces tecum
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Compellability of third-party witnesses
  • Third-party-records
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2003 BCSC 1064

R. v. Rojas

The court granted the first stage of an O'Connor application for correctional records of a proposed jailhouse informant, finding likely relevance to credibility and defence rights.

  • O'connor application
  • Jailhouse informant
  • Production of third party records
  • Full answer and defence
  • Likely relevance threshold
  • Oconnor-application
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.