Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2026 FC 194

Fazio v. Toronto-Dominion Bank

The Federal Court dismissed Marie Pia Fazio’s Rule 397 reconsideration motion, finding no overlooked matter and no basis to revisit its earlier order striking the claim.

  • Reconsideration
  • Pipeda jurisdiction
  • Leave to amend
  • Court registry conduct
  • Evidence and filing requirements
  • Pipeda
Read case analysis
Federal court jurisdiction 2025 FC 1977

Fazio v. Toronto-Dominion Bank

The Federal Court struck Marie Pia Fazio’s claim against TD Bank, holding that no federal statute gave the Court jurisdiction and that the pleading could not proceed.

  • Jurisdictional foundation
  • Pipeda complaint procedure
  • Bank act regulation
  • Negligent misrepresentation
  • Motion to strike (plain and obvious)
  • Federal-court-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2025 FC 1941

Noble v. Synergy Credit Union Ltd.

The Federal Court ordered the self-represented applicant to pay the respondent $500 in lump sum costs, after weighing Rule 400(3) factors and both parties’ conduct.

  • Pipeda s.14
  • Federal courts rules rule 400(3)
  • Tariff b costs assessment
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Functus officio
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2025 FC 1679

Noble v. Synergy Credit Union Ltd.

Federal Court dismissed most of a PIPEDA application against Synergy Credit Union Ltd., finding no proven ongoing privacy breach and no damages, but ordered limited account and membership records produced.

  • Pipeda schedule 1 principles
  • Access to personal information
  • Limiting collection and retention
  • Corrective measures and compliance
  • Exceptions to consent (s.7 pipeda)
  • Remedies and damages under pipeda
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2024 FC 667

Parker v. Ontario Medical Association

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to the OPC’s refusal to investigate an OMA physician overhead study, finding the proposed disclosure was not commercial activity under PIPEDA.

  • Pipeda
  • Commercial activity
  • Statistical research exception
  • Consent
  • Jurisdiction of privacy commissioner
  • Data disclosure to statistics canada
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2024 BCSC 391

Lam v. Flo Health Inc.

The court certified a national class against Flo Health Inc. over alleged disclosure of sensitive health data, and certified privacy, confidence, and intrusion issues.

  • Pipeda
  • Breach of confidence
  • Intrusion upon seclusion
  • Negligence
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Certification criteria
Read case analysis
Privacy (pipeda) 2023 FC 1428

9219-1568 Quebec Inc. v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner)

The Federal Court refused to enjoin publication of the Privacy Commissioner’s final report and declined to continue a broad confidentiality order, except for complainant-identifying material.

  • Pipeda s.13 deadlines
  • Pipeda s.12 refusal to investigate
  • Interim injunction (rjr‑macdonald test)
  • Publication ban
  • Confidentiality/sealing orders
  • Extraterritorial jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2023 FC 534

Facebook, Inc. v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner)

The Federal Court dismissed Facebook’s judicial review of the Privacy Commissioner’s PIPEDA investigation and report, finding the application late and the Commissioner’s conduct lawful.

  • Pipeda
  • Procedural fairness
  • Jurisdiction
  • Timeliness and extension of time
  • Standing
  • Real and substantial connection
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2023 FC 533

Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Facebook, Inc.

Federal Court dismissed the Privacy Commissioner’s PIPEDA application against Facebook, finding insufficient evidence of a breach in meaningful consent or safeguarding.

  • Pipeda
  • Meaningful consent
  • Data sharing with third parties
  • Safeguarding personal information
  • Third-party applications
  • Cambridge analytica
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2023 FC 236

Doan v. Canada (Attorney General)

La Cour fédérale rejette la certification d’un recours collectif fondé sur PIPEDA contre Clearview, estimant que les autres membres ne satisfont pas à l’art. 14.

  • Pipeda
  • Facial recognition
  • Standing and jurisdiction
  • Intrusion upon seclusion
  • Certification criteria
  • Preferability test
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.