Purssell v. Purssell
Because Eileen and Roy collectively hold one-half or more of the Property and requested sale, s.6 applied mandatorily; Tanis failed to establish a good reason to refuse sale (hardship and Agreement did not outweigh statutory right), the Sell Offers complied with the Agreement when made, and therefore the court ordered sale with proceeds apportioned by thirds and ancillary directions.
Source excerpt
- Partition
- Sale of property
- Co-ownership agreement
- Sell offer
- Section 6 partition of property act
- Section 8 partition of property act