Repp v. Butler
The petition was dismissed because the judge found, on the undisputed material, that the petitioner was fully aware of the respondent's position that he held a 50% legal and beneficial interest no later than October 23, 2015 (triggering the Limitation Act), and, independently, that the petition constituted an abuse of process given the petitioner's prior sworn and documentary representations in the Colorado divorce proceedings asserting a 50% interest; the Chisholm letter was admissible because it was not a settlement offer and summary determination was appropriate as the dispositive facts we…
Source excerpt
- Resulting trust
- Constructive trust
- Partition of property
- Limitation act discoverability
- Settlement privilege (without prejudice)
- Summary determination and hybrid procedures