Dorsey v. Canada (Attorney General)
Majority: Denial of reclassification/transfer did not constitute a deprivation of residual liberty because there was no change in conditions, no new or more restrictive detention and no acquired entitlement to minimum security; consequently habeas corpus was not available to challenge those denials; appeal dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Habeas corpus
- Residual liberty
- Security classification
- Prison transfer
- Charter ss.7/9/10(c)/12
- Grievance procedure