Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2025 CF 1321

Lill c. Canada (Procureur général)

La Cour fédérale accueille le contrôle judiciaire de Christopher Lill, concluant que le décideur a omis d’examiner des éléments essentiels du grief et renvoie l’affaire.

  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness standard
  • Grievance procedure
  • Security classification
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Discrimination
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 BCSC 2192

Bevan v. Fraser Regional Correctional Centre (Warden)

The court granted habeas corpus after finding Mr. Bevan’s transfer to a more restrictive institution was ongoing and procedurally unfair.

  • Habeas corpus
  • Procedural fairness
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Security classification
  • Residual liberty
  • Certiorari
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 793

Lee v. Pacific Institution (Warden)

The court dismissed a habeas corpus application challenging a proposed prison transfer, access to services, and lower-security placement, finding the claims outside habeas corpus scope.

  • Habeas corpus
  • Parole
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Risk assessment
  • Gladue principles
  • Judicial review jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2021 FC 835

Thompson v. Canada

The Federal Court dismissed Terry Thompson’s misfeasance claim, finding no collusion or unlawful intent in his transfer and no proof of compensable harm.

  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Habeas corpus
  • Judicial immunity
  • Judicial review
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Segregation
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2020 FC 1088

Muckle v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed an inmate’s motion for an extension of time and leave to seek judicial review, finding unexplained delay and doubt that any reviewable transfer decision existed.

  • Judicial review
  • Extension of time
  • Leave to apply
  • Charter rights
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 ONCA 67

Earhart v. Canada (Attorney General)

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the appellant had been transferred back to medium security before the extension of time and the lawfulness of his current detention must be determined by applying Khela principles to the present facts in the live habeas corpus proceeding rather than on the now‑academic record before the court on this appeal.

  • Habeas corpus
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Custody classification
  • Corrections and conditional release act s.27
  • Mootness
  • Khela principles
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 58

R. v. Keiros-Meyer

Habeas corpus challenge to an involuntary prison transfer was dismissed as moot after the inmate was returned to minimum security; the court declined to decide the merits.

  • Habeas corpus
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Procedural fairness
  • Mootness doctrine and discretion
  • Disclosure under s.27 ccra
  • Security classification
Read case analysis
Corrections law 2012 BCSC 103

Nguyen v. Mission Institution (Warden)

The court granted habeas corpus relief, finding Nguyen’s emergency transfer to maximum security unlawful because the disclosure and evidentiary basis were inadequate.

  • Habeas corpus
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Security classification
  • Procedural fairness
  • Disclosure
  • Reasonableness review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2011 FC 112

Holmes v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a refused prisoner-transfer request, holding that s. 6 of the Charter was not engaged, or alternatively was justified under s. 1.

  • Judicial review
  • Charter s.6 mobility rights
  • Charter s.1 justification (oakes)
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • International transfer of offenders act
  • Ministerial discretion
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2010 ONCA 103

Sampson v. Canada (Attorney General)

The transfer decision was upheld because it was procedurally fair and founded on reliable evidence from the security information officer; the failure to use the correctional services reliability guideline did not invalidate the decision and the transfer was not unreasonable.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Reliability of confidential informant
  • Prisoner transfer
  • Habeas corpus
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.