Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Personal injury 2020 BCSC 1072

Kaur v. Tse

Motor vehicle injury trial with liability admitted. Court found chronic neck and coccyx pain but rejected future earning and housekeeping losses, limiting damages after mitigation and credibility findings.

  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Mitigation
  • Future care
  • Loss of earnings
Read case analysis
Labour law 2013 SCC 70

IBM Canada Limited v. Waterman

The Supreme Court of Canada held that vested pension benefits generally are not deducted from wrongful dismissal damages. McLachlin C.J. and Rothstein J. dissented.

  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Damages
  • Compensating advantages (collateral benefits)
  • Pension deduction
  • Private insurance exception
  • Defined benefit vs defined contribution pensions
Read case analysis
Occupiers' liability 2011 BCSC 232

Druet v. Sandman Hotels, Inns & Suites Limited

The court found a hotel lobby floor unacceptably slippery when wet, held the occupier liable, but also found the plaintiff contributorily negligent. Liability was apportioned 50/50.

  • Slip and fall
  • Causation
  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment
  • Inspection and maintenance
  • Private insurance exception
Read case analysis
Tort 2008 BCSC 1746

Napoleone v. Sharma

The court held the plaintiff could recover only the net cost of special expenses, because the private insurance exception did not apply without proof of consideration paid for the benefits.

  • Private insurance exception
  • Double recovery
  • Damages for special expenses
  • Evidentiary burden
  • Subrogation
  • Double-recovery
Read case analysis
Insurance law C39121

Kosanovic v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company

Section 2(1)(b) of O. Reg. 676, enacted under the authority of s.265(1) of the Insurance Act, authorizes deduction from mandatory uninsured/unidentified driver minimum limits of amounts received under any valid policy of insurance; the common law private insurance exception does not prevent that deduction in the context of uninsured/unidentified driver coverage because the regulation appropriately limits entitlement and the Great West Life disability payments were not deductible from a tort award under s.267.8(1)2, so deduction under s.2(1)(b) is lawful, resulting in Wawanesa's liability bein…

  • Uninsured/unidentified driver coverage
  • Double recovery
  • Private insurance exception
  • Regulatory deductions (o. reg. 676 s.2(1)(b))
  • Threshold no-fault regime
Read case analysis
Tort 2002 BCCA 142

M.B. v. British Columbia

The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that social assistance benefits paid to M.B. did not have to be deducted from her past loss award, but interest had to be recalculated under the Court Order Interest Act.

  • Deductibility of collateral benefits
  • Charitable gifts exception
  • Private insurance exception
  • Calculation of pre-judgment interest
  • Double recovery
  • Collateral-benefits
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.