The court partly allowed a support-variation application, fixed the respondent’s income at $113,000, and retroactively adjusted spousal support for the claimant’s 2020–2021 earnings.
The court continued to apply the Guidelines tables until September 2015 because the child remained sufficiently like a minor during that period, treated student loans as a deductible contribution to post-secondary costs (no parental contribution where child loan covered costs), switched to a needs-based assessment from September 2015 when the child lived away and had means, found the payor’s non-disclosure and conduct blameworthy and therefore ordered a retroactive variation dated to the existing order, calculated arrears totalling $58,192.96 (corrected), and ordered repayment by monthly inst…