Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
M.A. was found to remain a child of the marriage. The court partially included Mr. A’s LOA in income for 2023, ordered equal property division, and awarded indefinite spousal support.
La Cour confirme l’ordonnance de frais de 1 197 942 $ au profit du défendeur, après réexamen à la lumière des décisions de la CAF.
Summary trial decision in a family dispute: spousal support was left for trial, while property division and sale of the family home were determined.
Judicial review allowed. The Federal Court set aside the refusal to waive Part X.1 tax, finding the delegate unreasonably treated the applicant as having been put on notice of the 2013 RRSP issue.
The court divided family property, rejected the respondent’s inheritance claim, imputed income after voluntary retirement, denied retroactive support, and ordered ongoing spousal support.
Appeal over family property division mostly dismissed. The court upheld trial-date valuation for appreciating assets, rejected fresh evidence, and adjusted the RRSP exclusion and a $30,000 debt.
Family law trial on divorce, parenting, property division, support, pensions, RRSPs, and special expenses. The claimant succeeded on the main property and support issues.
The Tax Court judge's factual finding that the investment occurred on January 4, 2002 was supported by contemporaneous documents; Landmark Canada's main business was holding shares of the Barbados company which did not carry on active business in Canada, so Landmark Canada was not an eligible or small business corporation and the investment was not a qualified investment under s.146(1); absent a palpable and overriding error this Court will not interfere, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Property division decision under the Family Law Act involving valuation date, excluded property, and unequal division of a former spousal home and investments.
The court ordered equal division of family property and debt, rejected an excluded-property claim to RRSP funds, and granted child support, spousal support, and divorce.
Explore more
