Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held the marriage agreement operated unfairly because it ignored Ms. Bradley’s indirect contributions and extraordinary asset growth, ordering $29 million reapportionment.
Family law trial on property division and spousal support. The court excluded an inherited ranch, valued US assets at trial exchange rates, and ordered periodic support.
The court applied the FRA under s. 252 of the FLA, found the cohabitation agreement valid but unfair, reapportioned property, and ordered support and divorce.
Appeal dismissed in a family property reapportionment dispute. The Court upheld the marriage agreement and found no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge’s factual findings.
The court upheld a 1997 marriage agreement, applied the Family Relations Act, and reapportioned the farm so the respondent received 12.5% of its value.
The court held the Divorce Agreement binding and found no unfairness under s. 65 of the Family Relations Act, so no reapportionment of the Richmond Property was ordered.
Court of Appeal remitted reapportionment and spousal support for fresh determination, finding errors in treating speculative inheritances and in the reasons given.
The court found disputed corporate shares were family assets, reapportioned them in the wife’s favour, ordered compensation and a charge, and awarded special costs.
The court reapportioned the family home sale proceeds 75/25 in favour of the respondent and ordered monthly and retroactive spousal support.
Family law judgment on support arrears and reapportionment of the Family Home under the FRA. The court found a 60/40 split in favour of Y.P.L.
Explore more
