Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2020 BCCA 65

R. v. Robertson

Court of Appeal declared the one-year mandatory minimum in s. 96(2)(a) unconstitutional, but upheld Jason Robertson’s 18-month global sentence.

  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Cruel and unusual punishment
  • Possession of stolen firearms
  • Totality principle
  • Reasonable hypothetical analysis
  • Mandatory-minimum-sentences
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 BCCA 416

R. v. Swaby

The court dismissed the Crown’s appeal and held that the 90-day mandatory minimum for summary possession of child pornography violated s. 12 and was of no force and effect.

  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Child pornography possession
  • Section 12 charter — cruel and unusual punishment
  • Conditional sentence orders
  • Reasonable hypothetical analysis
  • Section 1 charter (not argued)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 2052

R. v. Picard

The court upheld the one-year mandatory minimum under s. 7(2)(b)(iii) of the CDSA, rejected the s. 12 Charter challenge, and imposed the minimum sentence.

  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Section 12 charter cruel and unusual punishment
  • Controlled drugs and substances act s.7
  • Conditional sentence availability
  • Reasonable hypothetical analysis
  • Mandatory-minimum-sentences
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 636

R. v. Serov

The court dismissed a Charter s. 12 challenge to an 18-month mandatory minimum for marijuana production, finding it not grossly disproportionate.

  • Mandatory minimum sentences
  • Section 12 charter - cruel and unusual punishment
  • Marijuana production and aggravating factors
  • Reasonable hypothetical analysis
  • Mandatory-minimum-sentences
  • Section-12-charter
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 ONCA 681

R. v. Charles

The five-year mandatory minimum in s.95(2)(a)(ii), when Crown proceeds by indictment, is grossly disproportionate in reasonable hypotheticals that capture the full scope of s.95 and therefore violates s.12 of the Charter and cannot be saved under s.1; the s.7 challenge was rejected on the facts and by principle; the statute was declared of no force and effect to the extent described and the appellant's overall sentence was affirmed as fit.

  • Mandatory minimum sentencing
  • Firearms offences (s.95)
  • Section 12 gross disproportionality
  • Section 7 overbreadth/arbitrariness
  • Reasonable hypothetical analysis
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.