Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court held Dr. Hawkeswood’s expert report was admissible with limited redactions, finding it did not improperly assess credibility or show bias.
Chambers ruling on expert report admissibility: most objections to a responding occupational therapy expert report were dismissed, with two sentences struck as advocacy.
The court admitted the defendants’ expert report subject to redactions, finding no realistic concern of bias but removing credibility, irrelevant history, and prejudicial passages.
The court admitted a defence occupational therapist report in part, but ordered redaction of passages that were argumentative, credibility-based, or outside expertise.
The court held that an optometrist’s reports on brain injury exceeded the admissible scope of expertise and excluded Dr. Sass’s opinions entirely.
On voir dire, the court qualified a pharmacology expert on drug effects and dosage, but barred opinions on outpatient alcohol-withdrawal management, amnesia diagnosis, and automatism.
The court held one expert letter inadmissible and allowed two reports only after redactions, finding they contained improper factual findings and argument.
Explore more
