Because the bankrupt admitted knowingly filing false EI claims and obtaining money thereby, that liability falls within s.178(1)(e) BIA and is not discharged; the admission also constitutes a s.173(1) fact precluding an absolute discharge, therefore the court granted a conditional outcome and declared the EI overpayment not discharged and required clarifying language in the discharge order.
The court dismissed an application to keep a default judgment alive after bankruptcy, finding the pleadings did not allege fraud with required particularity.