Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2025 BCSC 1718

A.K. v. N.R.P.

Family law trial addressing parenting, property division, support, and conduct orders. The court ordered shared parenting, property equalization, support, and a divorce.

  • Parenting time
  • Parental responsibilities
  • Family violence
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Excluded property
  • Dissipation of assets
Read case analysis
Family law 2024 BCSC 1299

L.C.H. v. L.J.K.

On interim family-law applications, the court appointed a s. 211 assessor, continued counselling for the child, enforced parenting-coordination orders, and ordered compensatory parenting time.

  • Section 211 assessment
  • Parenting coordination
  • Counselling for child
  • Denial of parenting time
  • Child support guidelines
  • Contempt and enforcement sanctions
Read case analysis
Family law 2022 BCSC 1030

P.M. v. S.C.

The court found the mother’s move to Aldergrove was a material change, but declined to change the children’s primary residence. Parenting time, holidays, exchanges, communications and passports were varied.

  • Best interests of the child
  • Variation of parenting order
  • Material change of circumstances
  • Conduct orders
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Best-interests-of-the-child
Read case analysis
Family law 2022 BCSC 380

R.A.G. v. T.A.I.D.

The court partially varied earlier parenting orders, replacing a delayed s. 211 assessment with a limited s. 202 views of the child report, while preserving the trial date.

  • Section 211 assessment
  • Section 202 views of the child
  • Parenting time
  • Interim orders
  • Variation of court orders
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Family law 2020 BCSC 529

A.M.F.D. v. S.T.D.

The court dismissed the father's relocation request, ordered shared parenting in Victoria, imputed income, made support and property orders, and rejected occupational rent.

  • Family law act s.46 relocation
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Best interests of the child
  • Excluded property and tracing
  • Presumption of advancement
  • Occupational rent
Read case analysis
Family law 2019 BCSC 1381

R.K.L. v. Z.M.B.

The court allowed the mother to relocate the child to Ontario, found both parents were guardians, and set parenting, support, and retroactive support orders.

  • Best interests of the child
  • Relocation under family law act s.46
  • Parenting arrangements
  • Retroactive child support
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Best-interests-of-the-child
Read case analysis
Family law 2018 BCSC 1912

Marcus v. Trkla

The court varied a prior parenting order to permit supervised visits pending a s. 211 report, while confirming the child-focused best-interests approach and adjourned costs.

  • Access/parenting
  • Best interests of the child
  • Supervised access
  • Interplay of cfcsa and fla/divorce act
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law 2018 BCSC 2530

R.K.L. v. Z.M.B.

The court ordered a collateral section 211 assessment in Ontario, set interim summer parenting time, reinstated weekend parenting from September, and allocated assessment and travel costs.

  • Section 211 assessment
  • Interim parenting orders
  • Costs allocation
  • Expert collaboration
  • Best interests of the child
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law 2018 BCSC 84

J.A.F. v. J.J.F.

The court continued the father’s interim sole guardianship, kept reunification therapy in place, barred contact with the mother’s partner without approval, and ordered reports and review.

  • Best interests of the child
  • Reunification therapy
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Interim sole guardianship
  • Parenting time and contact restrictions
  • Child-custody
Read case analysis
Family law 2017 BCSC 2243

Jawanda v. Dhaliwal

Interim parenting orders were varied to increase the father’s time, set a fixed start date for overnights, require a sleep consultant, and direct shared exchanges.

  • Overnight parenting time
  • Parenting schedule
  • Section 211 assessment
  • Sleep consultant retention
  • Consent orders
  • Pick-up and drop-off arrangements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.