Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2013 BCCA 332

R. v. Bath

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed Mr. Bath’s s. 680 application for review of a chambers order refusing interim release pending appeal.

  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Section 679(3) criminal code
  • Public interest detention
  • Judicial deference to case management
  • Bail-pending-appeal
  • Criminal-appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 BCCA 62

R. v. Hammerstrom

The Court of Appeal declined to direct a review of a detention order, holding that section 680(1) did not apply because the order was not made under the provisions it covers.

  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Section 524 criminal code
  • Section 522 criminal code
  • Judicial interim release
  • Jurisdiction to review detention orders
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCCA 513

R. v. Van Dyke

The Court of Appeal directed review of a chambers refusal of judicial interim release, finding the low threshold under s. 680 of the Criminal Code was met.

  • Judicial interim release
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Section 679(3)(c) public interest
  • Seriousness of offence
  • Merits of appeal
  • Enforceability vs reviewability balancing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCCA 307

R. v. Hammerstrom

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for review under s. 680 of the Criminal Code, holding it lacked jurisdiction over the bail order.

  • Judicial interim release (bail)
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Jurisdiction to review bail orders
  • Section 469 offences
  • Bail
  • Criminal-code-section-680
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCCA 39

R. v. Cocks

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed an application for a s. 680 direction to review a bail refusal, finding no reasonable prospect of success.

  • Bail review
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Section 515(10) criminal code
  • Secondary and tertiary grounds for detention
  • Maintenance of public confidence in the administration of justice
  • Bail-review
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2010 NLCA 42

R. v. Sullivan

Treating the application as a s.680 review, the court in its discretion directed a three-judge review and varied the release conditions to permit possession of alcohol for employment purposes and access to George Street for employment while maintaining a prohibition on consumption; the variation was granted on consent of the Crown and as a limited modification of the original order.

  • Release conditions
  • Variation of release orders
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Consent to variation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2006 BCCA 541

R. v. Adams

Application under s. 680 of the Criminal Code for review of bail orders was dismissed because there was no prospect of success on a bail review hearing.

  • Bail pending appeal
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Application for directions
  • Bail-pending-appeal
  • Criminal-code-section-680
  • Application-for-directions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2006 BCCA 194

Saxena v. Thailand

The Court of Appeal held it had no jurisdiction to review an extradition order under Criminal Code s. 680 because that section was not incorporated by the Extradition Act.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Section 19.5 extradition act
  • Review powers of chief justice
  • Extradition
  • Statutory-interpretation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 BCCA 63

R. v. Patko

The Court of Appeal directed review of a bail order imposing a nightly curfew, finding it possible a division might vary the condition under s. 680(1) of the Criminal Code.

  • Bail conditions
  • Curfew
  • Judicial review
  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Variation of conditions
  • Bail-conditions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2004 BCCA 394

R. v. Braut

The Court of Appeal directed review of a prior order dismissing a stay application concerning two driving prohibition orders, applying the s. 680(1) threshold.

  • Section 680 criminal code
  • Stay of orders
  • Driving prohibition orders
  • Criminal-appeals
  • Appellate-procedure
  • Driving-prohibition-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.